# Iran moves to formalize ship fees in the Strait of Hormuz

Iran’s parliament has advanced a draft provision that would allow the government to charge ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, according to a report dated August 23, 2026.

The evidence says the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission approved Article 3 of a bill called the "Strategic Action to Ensure the Security and Progress of the Strait of Hormuz." Under the proposal, vessels using the waterway could be charged for services including maritime support, environmental services, fueling under special conditions, insurance, safety and other related work. The report attributes the information to Iran’s IRNA news agency and says committee spokesperson Hassan Qashqavi described the fee structure in public comments.

If the draft becomes law, the financial requirement would apply to vessels from countries permitted to pass through the strait, with payment collected in Iranian rials or another currency. That detail is significant because it suggests Tehran is not simply making a symbolic political statement. It is trying to build a legal and administrative framework around a route that is already one of the most strategically sensitive chokepoints in global shipping.

The Strait of Hormuz matters because it links the Persian Gulf to the open ocean and carries a large share of the world’s seaborne energy traffic. Even a limited fee mechanism would therefore have implications far beyond Iran’s own coastline. It would also add another point of friction in a region already shaped by sanctions, military tension and competing legal claims over maritime passage.

The proposed measure still has several hurdles. The evidence says it must go to a full parliamentary vote on both the specific provisions and the overall bill. If parliament approves it, the draft then goes to the Guardian Council, which reviews legislation for conformity with the constitution and Islamic principles. So while the committee action is important, it is not yet final law.

The report also places the move in a broader political context. It says passage through the strait was free before the war, but Iran now insists on charging fees. The United States rejects the imposition of such charges. The evidence further notes that Donald Trump recently posted a map labeling the Strait of Hormuz as “new US territory,” a reminder that the corridor has become a stage for symbolic as well as legal disputes.

Iran’s draft does not appear to be about a single incident. It is about control, leverage and the normalization of a payment regime in one of the world’s most watched waterways. Whether the measure survives parliament and the Guardian Council will determine whether it becomes a practical policy or remains a political signal.

For shipping companies, insurers and states dependent on Gulf exports, the significance lies in the precedent. A fee structure in the strait could alter cost calculations and risk assessments even before any vessel actually pays. For Iran, the proposal offers a way to turn strategic geography into revenue and into another point of pressure in its disputes with the West.

The committee vote is only one step, but it is a meaningful one. Tehran is moving from rhetoric about the Strait of Hormuz to an effort to codify a charge for moving through it, and that makes the draft worth watching well beyond Iran’s parliament.