This account treats the date above as the time of the underlying event, not as a publication date. It is confined to what the cited reporting established at that point. Details that were uncertain, attributed, provisional or still developing remain presented on those terms, and no later result is assumed.

What the reporting established

Taiwan’s government stated that over 5,500 individuals had been evacuated in advance of the typhoon’s arrival, and all domestic flights – a total of 252 – as well as 129 international routes have been cancelled, the transport ministry stated. Taiwan’s two main international carriers, China Airlines and EVA Air, stated their cancellations were for routes out of Kaohsiung, with some flights from the island’s main international airport at Taoyuan stopped as well.

It is expected to next make landfall on China’s southern coast late on Wednesday or early Thursday, affecting Fujian and Guangdong provinces, as documented by Chinese state broadcaster CCTV. As much as 600mm (almost 24 inches) of rain has been forecast in southern Taiwan’s mountainous areas over the next few days, the CWA stated, while nine cities and counties made public the suspension of work and school, including the southern metropolises of Kaohsiung and Tainan.

The typhoon made landfall on Wednesday, slamming into the southeastern city of Taitung at about 1pm (05:00 GMT), passing through the southern tip of the island and then passing into the Taiwan Strait some five hours later, Taiwan’s Central Weather Administration (CWA) stated. One person was documented missing and 33 others injured, the government stated.

Schools and workplaces close, hundreds of flights cancelled and thousands evacuate as Typhoon Podul slams island. Typhoon Podul has blown through Taiwan’s south with winds as powerful as 191km/h (118mph), leaving one person missing, forcing thousands of individuals to evacuate, schools to close, and hundreds of flights to be cancelled.

Scope of the record

The record is most useful when read as a contemporaneous snapshot. It identifies the central development, the people or institutions directly involved and the consequences described by the available reporting. Statements made by officials, witnesses or other parties are not converted into independent findings; their source and status remain material to understanding the account.

The evidence also sets limits on the conclusions that can safely be drawn. It does not support speculation about motives, responsibility or subsequent outcomes beyond what was explicitly reported. Figures and operational descriptions can be revised as fuller information emerges, so the numbers and characterisations here belong to the dated record rather than a final historical tally.